The Judicial Regulation of Improper Bargaining and of Violations of Law and Public Policy
This chapter and Chapter 14 deal with several related but distinct doctrines. Sections 13.2 through 13.12 cover a group of doctrines that are designed to regulate improper bargaining: misrepresentation, duress, undue influence, and unconscionability. The theme that connects these doctrines is the balance between the policy of protecting reliance that underlies the objective test of contract and the policy of freedom of contract that dictates not only that parties should have the freedom to enter contracts, but also that they should not be held to contracts to which they did not voluntarily assent. Although the objective test focuses on the manifested intent of the parties rather than on their subjective states of mind, a rigid adherence to objectivity could mask the fact that the apparent assent was not genuine, but was obtained by deceit or improper bargaining tactics. The doctrines mentioned above allow the court to go behind the manifestation of intent to decide if a party’s apparent agreement is based on an acceptable degree of volition. They are regulatory in that they allow the court to regulate improper bargaining behavior. They are sometimes called policing doctrines.