Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register

ANSWERS TO MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS

1. D Farrell’s offer was for a unilateral contract — his promise to pay in return for Stuart’s postponing the wedding. When Stuart postponed the wedding, he accepted Farrell’s offer, and a contract was formed.

Some cases have held that an agreement never to marry violates public policy, but there is no reason why an agreement to postpone a marriage would do so. A is, therefore, incorrect. B is incorrect because Farrell’s promise was to pay if Stuart postponed the wedding. His language did not make payment conditional upon Stuart’s registration for a second year. Although an offer terminates upon the death of the offeror, C is incorrect because Stuart accepted the offer by postponing the wedding, and once accepted, an offer is no longer revocable.

Please or Register to view full content.

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following