Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register

Cherry v. McCall

Citation. Cherry v. McCall, 138 S.W.3d 35 (Tex. App. 2004)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Robert and Maria Cherry sought a declaratory judgment based on breach of contract or mutual mistake after discovering mold in a house that they purchased from Brian and Rebekah McCall. 

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

A contract can be rescinded on the basis of mutual mistake.

Facts.

Robert and Maria Cherry (Cherry) bought a home “as is” from Brian and Rebekah McCall (McCall). Cherry discovered that there was a walled-in room in the basement that was filled with mold and trash. Cherry sued McCall seeking a judgment for breach of contract or mutual mistake. Summary judgment was granted to McCall and Cherry appealed. 

Issue.

Whether a contract may be rescinded on the basis of mutual mistake?

Held.

Yes. Cherry agreed to bear the risk of mistake through the as-is clause of the contract. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

Discussion.

Mutual mistake may terminate a contract where both parties maintain a mistake of fact that affects the terms of the agreement. If a party has agreed to bear the risk of mistake, then that party cannot rescind the contract due to a mistake of fact. 


Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following