Cherry v. McCall

Citation. Cherry v. McCall, 138 S.W.3d 35 (Tex. App. 2004)

Powered by

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

CitationCherry v. McCall, 138 S.W.3d 35 (Tex. App. 2004)

Brief Fact Summary.

Robert and Maria Cherry sought a declaratory judgment based on breach of contract or mutual mistake after discovering mold in a house that they purchased from Brian and Rebekah McCall. 

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

A contract can be rescinded on the basis of mutual mistake.

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

We review a trial court's determination that there has been an adequate time for discovery under an abuse of discretion standard.

View Full Point of Law

Robert and Maria Cherry (Cherry) bought a home “as is” from Brian and Rebekah McCall (McCall). Cherry discovered that there was a walled-in room in the basement that was filled with mold and trash. Cherry sued McCall seeking a judgment for breach of contract or mutual mistake. Summary judgment was granted to McCall and Cherry appealed. 

Issue.

Whether a contract may be rescinded on the basis of mutual mistake?

Held.

Yes. Cherry agreed to bear the risk of mistake through the as-is clause of the contract. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

Discussion.

Mutual mistake may terminate a contract where both parties maintain a mistake of fact that affects the terms of the agreement. If a party has agreed to bear the risk of mistake, then that party cannot rescind the contract due to a mistake of fact.