To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Steward Machine Co. v. Davis

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Constitutional Law Keyed to Stone

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 301 U.S. 548, 57 S. Ct. 883, 81 L. Ed. 1279, 1937 U.S. 1199.

Brief Fact Summary. The federal unemployment system provided a scheme whereby employers paid a tax to the federal government, but they could deduct the same tax if they made a contribution to a state employment fund.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. For a tax and credit scheme to be unconstitutional as against the Fifth Amendment or of principles of federalism, there must be a showing that the tax and credit used together are coercive and/or that they impair the autonomy of the States.

Facts. Under the federal unemployment compensation system employers were required to pay a certain tax to the United States Treasury. But if they made a contribution to a “certified” state unemployment fund, they could deduct up to 90 percent of the same tax liability. The Plaintiff, the Steward Machine Company (Plaintiff), challenged the validity of the tax system on constitutional grounds.

Issue. Was the federal unemployment tax system in violation of the Fifth Amendment or of principles of federalism?
See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following