Add to Library

Search

Stanley v. Georgia

Citation. 394 U.S. 557, 89 S. Ct. 1243, 22 L. Ed. 2d 542, 1969 U.S.

Powered by

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

Citation394 U.S. 557, 89 S. Ct. 1243, 22 L. Ed. 2d 542, 1969 U.S.

394 U.S. 557, 89 S. Ct. 1243, 22 L. Ed. 2d 542, 1969 U.S.

Brief Fact Summary. The Petitioner, Stanley’s (Petitioner) home was being searched for evidence of bookmaking when officers found obscene films.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. Mere possession of obscenity is not punishable under the United States Constitution (Constitution).

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

As to what is to be taken, nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant.

View Full Point of Law

point of law

Facts. The Petitioner was being investigated for bookmaking. Officers were searching his home when they found 8mm films that they determined to be obscene. They confiscated the materials and charged the Petitioner with knowingly having possession of obscene matter.

Issue. Does this law prohibiting possession of obscenity violate the First Amendment of the Constitution?

Held. Yes. The Constitution prohibits making mere possession a crime.

Discussion. The government is not allowed to dictate to people what they will and will not read, watch or enjoy. The Constitution strictly protects an individual from such unwarranted intrusion and control.

Create New Group