Preface |
|||||
Casebook Correlation Chart |
|||||
Capsule Summary |
|
||||
Chapter 1 |
|
||||
I. |
CIVIL PROCEDURE GENERALLY |
|
|||
A. |
“Civil” procedure vs. “criminal” procedure |
|
|||
B. |
Two court systems |
|
|||
C. |
Grounds for federal court jurisdiction |
|
|||
D. |
Both systems studied |
|
|||
E. |
A road map |
|
|||
1. |
Personal jurisdiction |
|
|||
2. |
Venue |
|
|||
3. |
Subject matter jurisdiction |
|
|||
4. |
Pleading |
|
|||
5. |
Discovery |
|
|||
6. |
Ascertaining applicable law |
|
|||
7. |
Trial procedure |
|
|||
8. |
Multi-party and multi-claim litigation |
|
|||
9. |
Former adjudication |
|
|||
Chapter 2 |
|
||||
I. |
GENERAL PRINCIPLES |
|
|||
II. |
JURISDICTION OVER INDIVIDUALS |
|
|||
A. |
Individual’s presence |
|
|||
B. |
Domicile |
|
|||
C. |
Residence |
|
|||
D. |
Consent |
|
|||
E. |
Non-resident motorist statutes |
|
|||
F. |
In-state tortious acts |
|
|||
G. |
Owners of in-state property |
|
|||
H. |
Conducting business |
|
|||
I. |
Modern statutory treatment (Illinois) |
|
|||
J. |
Foreign nationals |
|
|||
K. |
Statutes going to limits of due process |
|
|||
L. |
Limits of “due process” undefined for suits against individuals |
|
|||
III. |
JURISDICTION OVER CORPORATIONS |
|
|||
A. |
Issues covered |
|
|||
B. |
Some general principles |
|
|||
C. |
“Minimum contacts” as basis for jurisdiction (Int’l Shoe) |
|
|||
D. |
The meaning of “minimum contacts” |
|
|||
E. |
Suit based on products shipped into the forum state |
|
|||
1. |
Suit asserts “specific jurisdiction” |
|
|||
2. |
Long-arms allow |
|
|||
3. |
Due process issues |
|
|||
4. |
Several Supreme Court cases |
|
|||
5. |
Intentional effort to market in-state (World-Wide Volkswagen case) |
|
|||
6. |
Awareness of sales in foreign state (Asahi) |
|
|||
7. |
Sale by D’s distributor into forum state (McIntyre) |
|
|||
8. |
Summary on out-of-state vendors |
|
|||
F. |
Establishing “minimum contacts” by use of an Internet Website |
|
|||
G. |
Suits based on contractual relationship |
|
|||
H. |
Class action plaintiffs |
|
|||
I. |
Plaintiff’s lack of contacts |
|
|||
IV. |
“GENERAL” JURISDICTION |
|
|||
A. |
Where we are now |
|
|||
B. |
The original “systematic and continuous” test |
|
|||
C. |
The new “at home in the state” requirement |
|
|||
D. |
Meaning of “at home” (Daimler v. Bauman) |
|
|||
E. |
Use of agents by out-of-state defendant |
|
|||
1. |
Use of corporate subsidiary |
|
|||
2. |
Two-prong test for attributing subsidiary’s contacts to parent |
|
|||
3. |
General vs. specific jurisdiction |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
V. |
FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER THE PARTIES |
|
|||
A. |
General principles |
|
|||
B. |
Territory for service |
|
|||
1. |
Not imposed by Constitution |
|
|||
2. |
Service out of state |
|
|||
3. |
100-mile bulge |
|
|||
4. |
Foreign defendant not servable in any state |
|
|||
5. |
Gaps possible |
|
|||
C. |
Manner of service |
|
|||
1. |
Individual |
|
|||
2. |
Corporation |
|
|||
3. |
Waiver of service |
|
|||
4. |
Time for service |
|
|||
D. |
Amenability to suit |
|
|||
1. |
Federal question |
|
|||
2. |
Diversity |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VI. |
JURISDICTION OVER THINGS |
|
|||
A. |
General principles |
|
|||
1. |
In rem actions |
|
|||
2. |
Quasi in rem actions |
|
|||
3. |
Method of attachment |
|
|||
B. |
In rem jurisdiction |
|
|||
C. |
Quasi in rem jurisdiction |
|
|||
D. |
Limited appearances |
|
|||
E. |
Federal quasi in rem jurisdiction |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VII. |
NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD |
|
|||
A. |
General principles |
|
|||
B. |
Traditional notice requirements |
|
|||
C. |
Modern notice requirements |
|
|||
D. |
Statutory provisions vs. actual results |
|
|||
E. |
Opportunity to be heard |
|
|||
F. |
Prejudgment remedies, including attachment |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VIII. |
DEFENSES TO CLAIMS OF JURISDICTION |
|
|||
A. |
General principles |
|
|||
B. |
Special appearance |
|
|||
C. |
Enforcement of judgments |
|
|||
D. |
Collateral attack |
|
|||
E. |
Defense of fraud or duress |
|
|||
F. |
Immunity |
|
|||
1. |
Witnesses |
|
|||
2. |
Defendants |
|
|||
3. |
Plaintiffs |
|
|||
4. |
Federal immunity |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
IX. |
VENUE |
|
|||
A. |
General principles |
|
|||
B. |
Venue in state actions |
|
|||
C. |
Transitory vs. local actions |
|
|||
D. |
Forum non conveniens |
|
|||
E. |
Venue in federal actions |
|
|||
1. |
Federal statute |
|
|||
2. |
“Defendant’s residence” venue |
|
|||
3. |
“Place of events or property” venue |
|
|||
4. |
The “escape hatch” provision |
|
|||
5. |
No “plaintiff’s residence” venue |
|
|||
6. |
Corporation |
|
|||
7. |
Unincorporated associations |
|
|||
8. |
Waiver of venue claims |
|
|||
9. |
Venue in federal removal cases |
|
|||
10. |
Federal forum non conveniens |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
Chapter 3 |
|
||||
I. |
GENERAL PRINCIPLES |
|
|||
II. |
FEDERAL SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION GENERALLY |
|
|||
III. |
DIVERSITY JURISDICTION |
|
|||
A. |
Constitutional provision |
|
|||
B. |
Complete diversity required |
|
|||
C. |
Nominal parties ignored |
|
|||
D. |
Refusal to exercise jurisdiction |
|
|||
E. |
Date of determination |
|
|||
F. |
Domicile, not residence, is what counts |
|
|||
G. |
Citizens of D.C. |
|
|||
H. |
Jurisdiction involving aliens |
|
|||
I. |
Diversity involving partnerships and corporations |
|
|||
J. |
Devices to create or destroy diversity |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
IV. |
FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION |
|
|||
A. |
Statutory basis |
|
|||
1. |
Interpretation constricted |
|
|||
2. |
No adequate definition |
|
|||
3. |
Federal claim |
|
|||
4. |
State-created claim needs interpretation of federal law |
|
|||
5. |
Must be revealed by the complaint |
|
|||
6. |
Claim based on the merits |
|
|||
7. |
Exception for cases raising substantial federal issue |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
V. |
AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY |
|
|||
A. |
General rule |
|
|||
B. |
Proof not required |
|
|||
C. |
Eventual recovery irrelevant |
|
|||
D. |
Whose point of view followed |
|
|||
E. |
Aggregation of claims |
|
|||
F. |
Effect of counterclaim |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VI. |
SUPPLEMENTAL (FORMERLY “ANCILLARY” AND “PENDENT”) JURISDICTION |
|
|||
A. |
Background |
|
|||
1. |
1990 amendments |
|
|||
B. |
The traditional “pendent” and “ancillary” ideas |
|
|||
1. |
Pendent jurisdiction |
|
|||
2. |
Ancillary jurisdiction |
|
|||
C. |
The present “supplemental” provision |
|
|||
1. |
Provision generally |
|
|||
2. |
Federal question cases |
|
|||
3. |
Diversity exclusions |
|
|||
4. |
Aggregation to satisfy the amount in controversy (the Allapattah case) |
|
|||
5. |
Discretionary rejection of supplemental jurisdiction |
|
|||
6. |
No effect on personal jurisdiction |
|
|||
7. |
Venue not required |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VII. |
REMOVAL OF CASES TO THE FEDERAL COURTS |
|
|||
A. |
General right to remove |
|
|||
B. |
Removal statute |
|
|||
C. |
Diversity and amount rules applicable |
|
|||
1. |
Anomaly |
|
|||
D. |
Removal not allowed by plaintiff |
|
|||
1. |
Shamrock case |
|
|||
E. |
Certain kinds of cases not removable |
|
|||
F. |
Original state-court jurisdiction not required |
|
|||
G. |
Pleadings not pierced |
|
|||
H. |
Removal of multiple claims |
|
|||
I. |
Remand |
|
|||
J. |
Waiver |
|
|||
K. |
Mechanics of removal |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
Chapter 4 |
|
||||
I. |
HISTORY AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES |
|
|||
II. |
MODERN FEDERAL PLEADING GENERALLY |
|
|||
A. |
Purpose |
|
|||
B. |
General principles |
|
|||
C. |
Mechanics of pleadings |
|
|||
1. |
Kinds of pleadings |
|
|||
2. |
Verification of pleadings |
|
|||
3. |
Attorney must not file frivolous pleading (Rule 11) |
|
|||
4. |
Pleading in the alternative |
|
|||
III. |
THE COMPLAINT |
|
|||
A. |
Definition of complaint |
|
|||
B. |
Elements of complaint |
|
|||
C. |
Jurisdictional allegation |
|
|||
D. |
Degree of specificity required |
|
|||
E. |
Single or separate counts |
|
|||
F. |
Demand for judgment |
|
|||
G. |
Special matters |
|
|||
IV. |
MOTIONS AGAINST THE COMPLAINT |
|
|||
A. |
Motions generally |
|
|||
B. |
12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state claim |
|
|||
1. |
Standard for granting |
|
|||
2. |
Historical standard for granting |
|
|||
3. |
Twombly “plausibility” standard |
|
|||
4. |
“Plausibility” test given extra teeth (Ashcroft v. Iqbal) |
|
|||
5. |
12(b)(6) dismissal motions after Twombly and Iqbal |
|
|||
6. |
Amendment following dismissal |
|
|||
C. |
Motion for judgment on the pleadings |
|
|||
D. |
Motion for more definite statement |
|
|||
E. |
Motion to strike |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
V. |
THE ANSWER |
|
|||
A. |
The answer generally |
|
|||
B. |
Denials |
|
|||
C. |
Signed by defendant’s attorney |
|
|||
D. |
Affirmative defenses |
|
|||
E. |
Counterclaims |
|
|||
VI. |
TIME FOR VARIOUS PLEADINGS |
|
|||
VII. |
AMENDMENT OF THE PLEADINGS |
|
|||
A. |
Liberal policy |
|
|||
B. |
Amendment as of right |
|
|||
C. |
Amendment by leave of court |
|
|||
D. |
Relation back |
|
|||
1. |
Utility |
|
|||
2. |
When action is deemed “commenced” |
|
|||
3. |
Easier state “relation back” rule followed |
|
|||
4. |
What’s a single “conduct, transaction, or occurrence” |
|
|||
5. |
Change of party |
|
|||
VIII. |
VARIANCE OF PROOF FROM PLEADINGS |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
Chapter 5 |
|
||||
I. |
GENERAL PRINCIPLES |
|
|||
II. |
SCOPE OF DISCOVERY |
|
|||
A. |
Scope covered by Rule 26(b) |
|
|||
B. |
General scheme |
|
|||
C. |
Relevance |
|
|||
D. |
Privilege |
|
|||
E. |
Trial preparation immunity |
|
|||
1. |
Conflict |
|
|||
2. |
Distinction |
|
|||
3. |
Absolute or qualified |
|
|||
4. |
Hickman v. Taylor |
|
|||
5. |
Rules not adequate |
|
|||
6. |
Revision of Rules |
|
|||
7. |
Qualified immunity |
|
|||
8. |
Absolute immunity |
|
|||
9. |
Statements by witnesses |
|
|||
10. |
Names of witnesses |
|
|||
F. |
Discovery concerning experts |
|
|||
1. |
Classes of experts |
|
|||
2. |
Experts to be called at trial |
|
|||
3. |
Experts retained by counsel, but not to be called at trial |
|
|||
4. |
Unretained experts not to be called at trial |
|
|||
5. |
Participant experts |
|
|||
G. |
Impeachment material |
|
|||
H. |
Insurance agreements |
|
|||
I. |
Mandatory disclosure |
|
|||
1. |
Automatic pre-discovery disclosure |
|
|||
2. |
Disclosure of expert testimony |
|
|||
3. |
Trial witnesses and exhibits |
|
|||
4. |
Exclusion at trial |
|
|||
J. |
Duty to supplement |
|
|||
K. |
Privilege log |
|
|||
L. |
Required meetings |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
III. |
METHODS OF DISCOVERY |
|
|||
A. |
General characteristics |
|
|||
B. |
Persons affected |
|
|||
C. |
Times usable |
|
|||
D. |
Oral depositions (Rule 30) |
|
|||
E. |
Depositions upon written questions |
|
|||
F. |
Interrogatories to the parties |
|
|||
G. |
Requests for admission (Rule 36) |
|
|||
H. |
Requests to produce documents and to inspect land |
|
|||
I. |
Physical and mental examinations (Rule 35) |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
IV. |
ORDERS AND SANCTIONS |
|
|||
A. |
General availability of sanctions |
|
|||
B. |
Abuse of discovery |
|
|||
C. |
Compelling discovery |
|
|||
D. |
Sanctions |
|
|||
1. |
Financial sanctions |
|
|||
2. |
Other sanctions |
|
|||
3. |
Wilfulness usually required |
|
|||
4. |
Which court may issue |
|
|||
5. |
Physical exam |
|
|||
6. |
Where allowed |
|
|||
7. |
Sanctions prior to issuance of order |
|
|||
V. |
USE OF DISCOVERY RESULTS AT TRIAL |
|
|||
A. |
Use of results generally |
|
|||
B. |
Rules on use |
|
|||
C. |
Rule 34 requests to produce |
|
|||
D. |
Depositions |
|
|||
E. |
Interrogatories |
|
|||
F. |
Admissions |
|
|||
G. |
Physical and mental examinations |
|
|||
H. |
Use in subsequent proceedings |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VI. |
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE |
|
|||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
Chapter 6 |
|
||||
I. |
NATURE OF PROBLEM |
|
|||
II. |
THE ERIE DECISION AND OTHER FUNDAMENTALS |
|
|||
A. |
Rules of Decision Act |
|
|||
B. |
Federal procedural law |
|
|||
III. |
ERIE PROBLEMS |
|
|||
A. |
Ascertaining state law |
|
|||
B. |
Conflict of laws |
|
|||
C. |
Burden of proof |
|
|||
D. |
Procedure/substance problems |
|
|||
1. |
Federal Rules always take precedence |
|
|||
2. |
Rule’s validity under Enabling Act |
|
|||
3. |
Little protection of state substantive interests |
|
|||
4. |
Reliance on Erie to construe Rules |
|
|||
5. |
Outcome-determination and the Federal Rules |
|
|||
6. |
Byrd v. Blue Ridge |
|
|||
7. |
Hanna v. Plumer |
|
|||
8. |
Conflict must exist |
|
|||
9. |
Conflict between congressional statute and state policy |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
IV. |
FEDERAL COMMON LAW |
|
|||
A. |
Federal common law still exists |
|
|||
B. |
Federal common law in diversity cases |
|
|||
C. |
Federal common law in state courts |
|
|||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
Chapter 7 |
|
||||
I. |
BURDEN OF PROOF |
|
|||
A. |
Two meanings of “burden of proof” |
|
|||
B. |
Factors in allocation |
|
|||
C. |
What meets burden |
|
|||
II. |
PRESUMPTIONS |
|
|||
A. |
Definition |
|
|||
B. |
Assumptions for discussion |
|
|||
1. |
Burden of production |
|
|||
2. |
Burden of persuasion |
|
|||
III. |
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
IV. |
ADJUDICATION WITHOUT TRIAL |
|
|||
A. |
Trial sometimes unnecessary |
|
|||
B. |
Voluntary dismissal by plaintiff |
|
|||
C. |
Involuntary dismissal |
|
|||
D. |
Summary judgment |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
V. |
TRIALS WITHOUT A JURY |
|
|||
A. |
When tried to court |
|
|||
B. |
Effect |
|
|||
C. |
Evidence rules |
|
|||
D. |
Findings of fact |
|
|||
E. |
Appellate review of factual findings from bench trials |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VI. |
THE JURY |
|
|||
A. |
Seventh Amendment |
|
|||
B. |
Number of jurors |
|
|||
C. |
Unanimity |
|
|||
D. |
Jury selection |
|
|||
E. |
Instructions |
|
|||
F. |
Juror misconduct |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VII. |
CHALLENGING THE JUDGE FOR BIAS |
|
|||
A. |
Judicial bias generally |
|
|||
B. |
The federal recusal statute |
|
|||
C. |
Bias great enough to violate due process |
|
|||
VIII. |
DIRECTED VERDICT / JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW |
|
|||
A. |
Effect |
|
|||
B. |
Standard for granting directed verdict |
|
|||
C. |
Erie effect of directed verdict standards |
|
|||
D. |
Use of JNOV |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
IX. |
SPECIAL VERDICT AND INTERROGATORIES |
|
|||
X. |
NEW TRIAL |
|
|||
A. |
Judge’s discretion |
|
|||
B. |
Federal new trials |
|
|||
C. |
New trial so judge can correct own error |
|
|||
D. |
New trial for prejudicial conduct by party, witness or counsel |
|
|||
E. |
New trial for jury misconduct |
|
|||
F. |
New trial where verdict against the weight of the evidence |
|
|||
G. |
New trial where verdict is excessive or inadequate |
|
|||
H. |
Remittitur and Additur |
|
|||
I. |
Partial new trial on damages |
|
|||
J. |
New trial for newly discovered evidence |
|
|||
K. |
Appealability of new trial order |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
XI. |
JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING VERDICT (JNOV) / JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (JML) |
|
|||
XII. |
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL |
|
|||
A. |
Seventh Amendment |
|
|||
B. |
Modern statutes and procedural devices, and their effect on the jury-trial right |
|
|||
C. |
Mixed legal and equitable claims |
|
|||
D. |
Deciding whether a particular statutory claim is legal or equitable |
|
|||
E. |
Procedural devices and the expansion of legal claims |
|
|||
F. |
Limitations on jury trial right |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
XIII. |
REMEDIES |
|
|||
A. |
Introduction |
|
|||
B. |
Damages generally |
|
|||
C. |
Compensatory damages |
|
|||
D. |
Punitive damages |
|
|||
1. |
Due process limits |
|
|||
E. |
Equitable remedies |
|
|||
XIV. |
APPEALS |
|
|||
A. |
Appeals generally |
|
|||
B. |
The scope of appellate review |
|
|||
C. |
The “final judgment” rule, and exceptions to it |
|
|||
1. |
The rule in general |
|
|||
2. |
When is a judgment “final” |
|
|||
3. |
Multi-claim and multi-party federal litigations (FRCP 54(b)) |
|
|||
4. |
Certifying the issue |
|
|||
5. |
The “collateral issue” exception |
|
|||
6. |
Orders involving the grant or denial of an injunction |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
Chapter 8 |
|
||||
I. |
BACKGROUND |
|
|||
II. |
COUNTERCLAIMS |
|
|||
A. |
Generally |
|
|||
B. |
Federal Rules |
|
|||
1. |
Permissive counterclaim |
|
|||
2. |
Compulsory counterclaim |
|
|||
C. |
“Transaction or occurrence” |
|
|||
D. |
Counterclaims by third parties |
|
|||
E. |
Failure to raise a compulsory counterclaim |
|
|||
F. |
Jurisdictional requirements for counterclaims |
|
|||
1. |
Supplemental jurisdiction |
|
|||
2. |
Permissive counterclaims not supplemental |
|
|||
G. |
Pleading of counterclaims |
|
|||
H. |
Statutes of limitations for counterclaims |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
III. |
JOINDER OF CLAIMS |
|
|||
A. |
Joinder of claims generally |
|
|||
IV. |
JOINDER OF PARTIES |
|
|||
A. |
Reason for joinder |
|
|||
B. |
Permissive joinder |
|
|||
C. |
Use in multi-plaintiff product liability cases |
|
|||
D. |
Jurisdiction in permissive joinder cases |
|
|||
1. |
In personam jurisdiction |
|
|||
2. |
Subject matter jurisdiction |
|
|||
3. |
Venue |
|
|||
E. |
Compulsory joinder (Rule 19) |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
V. |
CLASS ACTIONS |
|
|||
A. |
Background |
|
|||
B. |
Rule 23 generally |
|
|||
C. |
Rule 23(a)’s prerequisites for class actions |
|
|||
D. |
“Common questions of law or fact” (Wal-Mart case) |
|
|||
E. |
“Fair and adequate” representation of class |
|
|||
F. |
23(b)(1) actions |
|
|||
G. |
23(b)(2) actions |
|
|||
H. |
23(b)(3) actions |
|
|||
I. |
Requirement of notice |
|
|||
J. |
Binding effect of class action decision |
|
|||
K. |
Subject-matter jurisdiction issues |
|
|||
L. |
Determination that no valid class action exists |
|
|||
M. |
Waiver of the right to bring class action |
|
|||
N. |
Settlements |
|
|||
1. |
Notice requirement |
|
|||
2. |
Financial condition |
|
|||
3. |
Settlement-only class actions |
|
|||
O. |
Attorneys’ fees |
|
|||
P. |
Mass tort cases |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VI. |
INTERVENTION |
|
|||
A. |
Intervention generally |
|
|||
B. |
Intervention as of right |
|
|||
C. |
Permissive intervention |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VII. |
INTERPLEADER |
|
|||
A. |
Definition |
|
|||
B. |
Need for jurisdiction over both claimants |
|
|||
C. |
Federal statutory interpleader |
|
|||
D. |
Federal Rule interpleader |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
VIII. |
REAL PARTY IN INTEREST |
|
|||
A. |
Assignment |
|
|||
B. |
Suit in assignee’s name |
|
|||
C. |
Representative |
|
|||
IX. |
THIRD-PARTY PRACTICE (IMPLEADER) |
|
|||
A. |
Third-party defendant |
|
|||
B. |
Claim must be derivative |
|
|||
C. |
When leave of court not needed |
|
|||
D. |
Impleader by plaintiff |
|
|||
E. |
Jurisdictional requirements relaxed |
|
|||
F. |
Claims involving third-party defendant |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
X. |
CROSS-CLAIMS |
|
|||
A. |
Definition of cross-claim |
|
|||
B. |
Requirements |
|
|||
C. |
Jurisdiction |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
Chapter 9 |
|
||||
I. |
GENERAL PRINCIPLES |
|
|||
II. |
CLAIM PRECLUSION (MERGER AND BAR) |
|
|||
A. |
Definition |
|
|||
B. |
Scope of claim |
|
|||
C. |
Adjudication on the merits |
|
|||
D. |
Counterclaims |
|
|||
1. |
No splitting |
|
|||
2. |
Collateral estoppel danger |
|
|||
3. |
Compulsory counterclaims |
|
|||
E. |
Change of law |
|
|||
F. |
Persons not party to first action |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
III. |
COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL |
|
|||
A. |
Effect |
|
|||
B. |
Issues to which collateral estoppel applies |
|
|||
1. |
Same issue |
|
|||
2. |
Actually litigated and decided |
|
|||
3. |
Issue essential to verdict |
|
|||
4. |
Foreseeability of future litigation |
|
|||
5. |
Courts of limited jurisdiction |
|
|||
6. |
Differences in burden of proof |
|
|||
7. |
Settlement |
|
|||
8. |
Findings of law |
|
|||
9. |
Where second decision fails to apply estoppel |
|
|||
C. |
Persons bound by collateral estoppel |
|
|||
D. |
Persons who can benefit from estoppel |
|
|||
1. |
Mutuality |
|
|||
2. |
Demise of mutuality |
|
|||
3. |
Offensive/defensive distinction |
|
|||
4. |
Offensive estoppel approved by Supreme Court |
|
|||
5. |
Factors in case-by-case analysis |
|
|||
6. |
Use of criminal conviction |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
IV. |
FULL FAITH AND CREDIT |
|
|||
A. |
Scope |
|
|||
B. |
Effect |
|
|||
C. |
Misinterpretation of another state’s law |
|
|||
D. |
No duty to decisions of other countries |
|
|||
E. |
Full Faith and Credit to res judicata effect |
|
|||
F. |
Federal suit follows state suit |
|
|||
G. |
State suit follows federal suit |
|
|||
Quiz Yourself on |
|
||||
Exam Tips on |
|
||||
ESSAY EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS |
|
||||
TABLE OF CASES |
|
||||
TABLE OF REFERENCES TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE |
|
||||
TABLE OF REFERENCES TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE |
|
||||
SUBJECT MATTER INDEX |
|
||||