United States v . Owens
Brief

CitationUnited States v. Owens, 484 U.S. 554, 108 S. Ct. 838, 98 L. Ed. 2d 951, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 940, 56 U.S.L.W. 4160 (U.S. Feb. 23, 1988) Brief Fact Summary. The Appellant, Owens (the “Appellant”), a chief warrant officer two, was accused of murdering his wife and possession of an unregistered handgun. He was tried by a military tribunal and was convicted of unpremeditated murder and possession of unregistered handgun. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Military Rules of Evidence 607 and 608 allow testimony to be elicited from the Appellant regarding prior bad acts of intentional fals ...

United States v. Hogan
Brief

CitationUnited States v. Hogan, 712 F.2d 757, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26296 (2d Cir. Conn. June 28, 1983) Brief Fact Summary. The Hogan brothers were arrested and charged with importing marijuana and possession with intent to distribute. Their pilot, Mark Carpenter (“Mr. Carpenter”), was arrested in Mexico and taken into custody in Mexico. A few days after Carpenter’s arrest, he gave statements to a Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) official that implicated the Hogan brothers and himself in a conspiracy to import drugs. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A witness cannot b ...

State v. Oswalt
Brief

CitationState v. Oswalt, 72 Kan. 84, 82 P. 586, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 313 (Kan. 1905) Brief Fact Summary. On July 14, 1961, two armed men entered a residence, held several people in the home, and took another man to a retail store. The man was forced to open the safe and give the money to the intruders. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A witness cannot be impeached on matters which are collateral to the issue being tried. ...

Davidson v. Prince
Brief

CitationDavidson v. Prince, 813 P.2d 1225, 1991 Utah App. LEXIS 86, 163 Utah Adv. Rep. 58 (Utah Ct. App. June 18, 1991) Brief Fact Summary. The Appellant, Davidson (the “Appellant”), was injured after being attacked by a steer which had escaped from an overturned truck owned by the Appellee, Folkens Brothers Trucking (“Folkens”) and driven by the Appellee, Prince (the “Appellees”). Synopsis of Rule of Law. Utah Rules of Evidence (U.R.E.) Rule 704 prohibits expert testimony as to whether a person is negligent because that opinion requires a legal conclusi ...

Simon v. Kennebunkport
Brief

CitationSimon v. Kennebunkport, 417 A.2d 982, 1980 Me. LEXIS 627, 21 A.L.R.4th 465 (Me. 1980) Brief Fact Summary. The Appellant, Irene Simon (the “Appellant”), fell and broke her hip on a sidewalk in the Appellee town, Kennebunkport (the “Appellee”). The Appellant sued the Appellee, alleging the sidewalk was defective. The Appellant attempted to offer evidence of prior falls at the same location, but the trial court did not allow it. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Other incidents similar to the one causing injury may be admissible as long as the probative value outweigh ...

Tuer v. McDonald
Brief

CitationTuer v. McDonald, 347 Md. 507, 701 A.2d 1101, 1997 Md. LEXIS 554 (Md. Nov. 7, 1997) Brief Fact Summary. The Appellant, Eugene Tuer’s (“Mr. Tuer”) husband (the “Appellant”), died while awaiting heart surgery. Mr. Tuer’s surgery was delayed when the Appelleess, Dr. McDonald and others (the “Appelleess”), Mr. Tuer’s treating physician, was called to an emergency surgery. While awaiting surgery, Mr. Tuer died because he had not received a dose of Heparin, a coagulant which had been discontinued in anticipation of surgery. Synopsis ...

United States v. Platero
Brief

CitationUnited States v. Platero, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1239 (C.A.A.F. Dec. 29, 2014) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Platero (the “defendant”), was convicted of three counts of sexual assault. The defendant was accused of raping the victim after pulling her and her co-worker over while pretending he was a police officer. The defendant claimed the sex was consensual and she made up the sexual assault allegations to protect her relationship with another individual. Synopsis of Rule of Law. When a question of relevancy depends on a condition of fact, that question should be deter ...

Johnson v. Elk Lake School District
Brief

CitationJohnson v. Elk Lake Sch. Dist., 283 F.3d 138, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3327 (3d Cir. Pa. Mar. 1, 2002) Brief Fact Summary. The plaintiff, Betsy Sue Johnson (the “plaintiff”), sued her high school counselor and the school’s Administration, alleging the counselor sexually abused and harassed her over a two year period. She claims the counselor sent her suggestive notes and letters, attempted to hug and kiss her, and fondled her. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Federal Rules of Evidence (“F.R.E.”) Rule 415 allows evidence of past sexual assaults to be introduced in ...

State v. Cassidy
Brief

CitationState v. Cassidy, 22 Minn. 312, 1875 Minn. LEXIS 86 (Minn. 1875) Brief Fact Summary. The victim claimed sexual assault by the defendant. The parties had previously engaged in consensual sex, but on the night in question, the victim claimed she was assaulted and the defendant claimed it was consensual. The defendant attempted to offer a prior instance of sexual conduct between the victim and another man, which was not allowed by the trial court. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Evidence of a victim’s prior sexual conduct is not admissible unless excluding it violates the defendant&# ...

Olden v. Kentucky
Brief

CitationOlden v. Kentucky, 488 U.S. 227, 109 S. Ct. 480, 102 L. Ed. 2d 513, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 5621, 57 U.S.L.W. 3410 (U.S. Dec. 12, 1988) Brief Fact Summary. The Petitioner, James Olden (the “Petitioner”), a black man, was convicted of forcible sodomy of a white woman. The Petitioner maintained the sex was consensual, and the victim gave several different accounts of the alleged sexual assault. The victim testified that she was living with her mother at the time of the trial, and the Petitioner sought to introduce evidence that she was living with the only witness who corroborat ...

Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc
Brief

CitationHalloran v. Virginia Chemicals, Inc., 361 N.E.2d 991, 41 N.Y.2d 386, 393 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 1850 (N.Y. 1977) Brief Fact Summary. The plaintiff, Frank Halloran (the “plaintiff”), frequently serviced air conditioners as part of his job as an auto mechanic. On June 1, 1970, he was changing the air-conditioning compressor on a Chrysler. The plaintiff was filling the new compressor with Freon and heated one of the cans to increase the flow of the Freon, at which point the can exploded and injured him. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A party may introduce evidence of ha ...

Huddleston v. U.S
Brief

CitationHuddleston v. U. S. Air Conditioning Corp., 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4568, 56-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P10,076, 51 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1505 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 1956) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Huddleston (the “defendant”), was charged with the knowing possession of stolen videocassette tapes. The plaintiff, the United States’ Government (the “plaintiff”) introduced similar acts evidence that connected defendant to a series of sales of stolen appliances from the same store as the tapes. The plaintiff concluded that the evidence was relevant to the fact t ...

Perrin v. Anderson
Brief

CitationPerrin v. Anderson, 784 F.2d 1040, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22528, 19 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 1564 (10th Cir. Okla. Feb. 27, 1986) Brief Fact Summary. Terry Kim Perrin (“Mr. Perrin”) was shot and killed by Oklahoma state troopers. The troopers had gone to Mr. Perrin’s house to ask him questions about a traffic accident. At some point during the conversation, an altercation ensued and Mr. Perrin was killed by one of the officers. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Under Federal Rules of Evidence (“F.R.E.”) Rule 405, testimony regarding specific instances of ...

United States v. Cunningham
Brief

CitationUnited States v. Cunningham, 429 F.3d 673, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24468 (7th Cir. Ill. Nov. 14, 2005) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Cunningham (the “defendant”) was a nurse who removed Demerol from syringes that were intended for patients in pain. Evidence showed that the defendant was a Demerol addict and she was charged with tampering with a consumer product and reckless disregard for the risk that another person would be placed in danger of bodily harm. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Evidence of prior conduct may be admitted to show motive, but the judge may exclude su ...

Tucker v. State
Brief

CitationTucker v. State, 82 Nev. 127, 412 P.2d 970, 1966 Nev. LEXIS 203 (Nev. 1966) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Tucker (the “defendant”), called the police to come over to his house stating that there was an old dead man there. When police arrived they found the defendant drinking and the body of an old man was found on the couch. Although the defendant asserted he had been asleep and found the body when he awoke, a jury convicted him of second degree murder. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Under the rule of exclusion, evidence of other offenses is excluded unless it is relev ...

Michelson v. United States
Brief

CitationMichelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469, 69 S. Ct. 213, 93 L. Ed. 168, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2792 (U.S. Dec. 20, 1948) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Michelson (the “defendant”) is on trial for bribing a federal agent. The defendant admits the bribe, but claims entrapment as a defense. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A party has the right to cross-examine another parties character witnesses and inquire about past bad acts such as arrests and/or convictions. ...

United States v. Carrillo
Brief

CitationUnited States v. Carrillo, 16 F.3d 1046, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11086, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1212, 94 Daily Journal DAR 2133, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 531 (9th Cir. Nev. Feb. 18, 1994) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Carrillo (the “defendant”), was convicted for the distribution of heroin and cocaine. The plaintiff, the United States’ Government (the “plaintiff”), was allowed to present evidence of two other previous sales by the defendant. A jury found the defendant guilty despite the defendant’s objection to the admission of the ...

United States v. Beasley
Brief

CitationUnited States v. Beasley, 72 F.3d 1518, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 186, 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 723, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 715 (11th Cir. Fla. Jan. 5, 1996) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Beasley (the “defendant”), was convicted of seven counts of obtaining Dilaudid with an intent to distribute, and two counts of attempting to obtain Dilaudid by misrepresenting the name of the person to appear on the prescription. Synopsis of Rule of Law. The fact that other similar bad acts came after crimes charged in an indictment does not preclude their use as part of pat ...

Kammer v. Young
Brief

CitationKammer v. Young, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 4822, 488 U.S. 919, 109 S. Ct. 298, 102 L. Ed. 2d 318, 57 U.S.L.W. 3312 (U.S. Oct. 31, 1988) Brief Fact Summary. The plaintiff gave birth to a child in 1982. The defendant denies he is the father since relations with the plaintiff ended 15 months before the birth. The court admitted blood tests over the defendant’s objections and ruled in favor of the plaintiff. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Scientific methods which incorporate a factor in formulating a probability percentage of paternity from a paternity index do not deprive a putative father o ...

Cleghorn v. New York Central & H. River Ry. Co
Brief

CitationCleghorn v. New York C. & H. R. R. Co., 56 N.Y. 44, 1874 N.Y. LEXIS 78 (N.Y. 1874) Brief Fact Summary. The plaintiff, Cleghorn (the “plaintiff”), was a passenger on a train and suffered injuries when two trains collided. Evidence showed that the defendant, New York Central & H. River Ry. Co’s employee (the “defendant”), a switchman, excessively indulged in alcoholic beverages and was intoxicated at the time of the accident. This information was known by the defendant company who had the power to hire and fire the employee. Synopsis of Rule of ...

People v. Mountain
Brief

CitationPeople v. La Mountain, 249 A.D.2d 584, 671 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3568 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep’t Apr. 2, 1998) Brief Fact Summary. The plaintiff was being held for arraignment in a detention cell. The defendant was a police officer who was accused of entering the cell and raping the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have admitted incriminating semen evidence of the defendant that shows he is guilty. Synopsis of Rule of Law. In a prosecution for rape, proof that the defendant has the same common blood type as the man who is responsible for the crime is admiss ...

State v. Meeks
Brief

CitationState v. Meeks, 277 Kan. 609, 88 P.3d 789, 2004 Kan. LEXIS 234 (Kan. Apr. 23, 2004) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Meeks (the “defendant”), appealed his conviction of First Degree murder, claiming the statements of the victim were hearsay and that he should be afforded the opportunity to confront the victim. Synopsis of Rule of Law. When a dying victim makes statements to an officer, they are considered to be grounded in truth; a defendant wishing to object, based on the right to confrontation, forfeits that objection. ...

Chambers v. Mississippi
Brief

Citation537 U.S. 1018 123 S. Ct. 536, 154 L. Ed. 2d 425 154 L. Ed. 2d 425. Brief Fact Summary. Defendant, Leon Chambers, was convicted for the murder of a police officer, Aaron Liberty. As part of his defense, Defendant attempted to admit evidence that another man, Gable McDonald, committed the murder. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A state can not violate a defendant’s rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by restricting a defendant from examining a witness through the strict application of evidence rules. ...

Green v. Georgia
Brief

Citation535 U.S. 1080 Brief Fact Summary. Petitioner, Green, was convicted of the rape and murder of Teresa Carol Allen. During the sentencing phase, Petitioner attempted to admit testimony from a witness who was told by a second man that he alone killed Allen. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A state evidentiary rule can not violate a defendant’s right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. ...

United States v. Cromer
Brief

Citation View this case and other resources at: Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Cromer (the “defendant”), appealed his conviction on drug charges, when he was not given the ability to confront the government’s informant who gave him away. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Per the confrontation clause, a defendant should be afforded the opportunity to confront all persons who testify against him. ...