Register | Lost your password?

CaseBriefs

Knell v. Feltman

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 174 F.2d 662, 85 U.S. App. D.C. 22 1949 U.S. App.

Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiffs were passengers in a car driven by Knell, when the car collided with a taxicab owned by Feltman. Plaintiffs sued Feltman, who filed a third-party complaint against Knell for contributory negligence. The court ordered contribution by Knell to Feltman. Knell claims that contribution is not warranted because joint liability was not established.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. As long as concurrent tortfeasors are not intentional wrongdoers, contribution will be enforced regardless of whether or not a joint judgment is entered against them.


Facts. This case involves a car accident. The Plaintiffs, Evelyn Langland (Mrs. Langland) and her husband (Plaintiffs), were guest passengers in a car driven by Kenneth Knell. The car they were riding in collided with a taxicab owned by the Defendant, Ralph Feltman (Feltman) and operated by his employee. Mrs. Langland was seriously injured in the accident. The Plaintiffs sued the Defendant to recover damages. The Defendant filed a third-party complaint against Knell, claiming the accident was caused by his sole or contributing negligence. The jury found both the Defendant and Knell negligent. The court awarded judgment in favor of Plaintiffs against the Defendant for $11,500, and upon payment, judgment in favor of Defendant against Knell for $5,750. Knell appeals, claiming that the right of contribution exists only between tortfeasors liable in common to the plaintiff and his liability to the Plaintiffs was not established by the judgment because the Plaintiffs did not include him in
the suit.

Issue. Is a joint judgment against tortfeasors who commit a tort through concurrent negligence a prerequisite for enforcement of contribution?

Content Type: Brief


Comments are closed.