Register | Lost your password?

CaseBriefs

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 412 U.S. 218, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 36 L. Ed. 2d 854 (1973)

Brief Fact Summary. Police stopped a vehicle containing the respondent, Robert Bustamonte (the “respondent”), and they asked to search the vehicle. Another passenger in the car gave permission, and the search produced stolen checks that were entered into evidence against the Respondent.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. To determine whether a search was voluntary does not require that a person knew of his rights, but whether the totality of circumstances indicated that the person was voluntarily allowing the search.


Facts. The police stopped the vehicle containing the respondent and five other passengers after they noticed a broken headlight and license plate light. When the driver could not produce a license, the police asked for someone who could produce identification. Another passenger responded, and when the police asked him if they could search the vehicle he consented. Three stolen checks were found, and they were used as evidence to convict the respondent.

Issue. The issue is whether the respondent voluntarily consented to the search of the vehicle.

Content Type: Brief


Comments are closed.