To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Rochin v. California

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Criminal Procedure keyed to Weinreb

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 342 U.S. 165, 72 S. Ct. 205, 96 L. Ed. 183 (1952)

Brief Fact Summary. The Appellant, Rochin (Appellant), alleged that the Due Process Clause had been violated when police forced him to vomit two capsules that he had swallowed.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. The police cannot extract evidence from inside of a person’s body by force.

Facts. Three officers entered the Appellant’s home and saw two capsules on a nightstand. When they inquired as to who owned the capsules, the Appellant swallowed them. After an unsuccessful attempt to dislodge the capsules from Appellant’s mouth, the officers took the Appellant to a hospital. At the hospital, the Appellant’s stomach was pumped against his will to induce vomiting. Two capsules containing morphine were found within the vomited material.

Issue. Can the police forcibly extract evidence from a person’s stomach?

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following