Register | Lost your password?

CaseBriefs

Maryland v. Pringle

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 540 U.S. 366, 124 S. Ct. 795, 157 L. Ed. 2d 769 (2003)

Brief Fact Summary. Pringle appealed a conviction, based on lack of probable cause, when he was arrested for paraphernalia found in the back of another person’s a car, while sitting in the front.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. When a reasonable officer can conclude that a defendant is guilty, probable cause exists.


Facts. Respondent, Pringle, was the front-seat passenger in a car that was stopped for speeding. Upon stopping the car, the arresting officer found money in the glove compartment and cocaine in the back-seat armrest. The officer arrested all three occupants of the car and Pringle was convicted for possession with intent to distribute cocaine after he signed a written confession. Pringle appealed, arguing that probable cause to arrest him did not exist.

Issue. Whether the arrest of a front-seat passenger in a car driven by its owner lacks probable cause in violation of the Fourth Amendment when the basis for the arrest is paraphernalia found in the back of the car.

Content Type: Brief


Comments are closed.