To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Lockhart v. McCree

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Criminal Procedure keyed to Israel

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 476 U.S. 162, 106 S. Ct. 1758, 90 L. Ed. 2d 137 (1986)

Brief Fact Summary. Jurors were removed during voir dire because they objected to the death penalty.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. “[T]he Constitution does not prohibit the States from ‘death qualifying’ juries in capital cases.”

Facts. McCree was charged with felony capital murder. During voir dire, the trial judge, in accordance with Arkansas law, removed eight perspective jurors who stated that they would not vote for a death sentence, over McCree’s objections. McCree was convicted, and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. The conviction was affirmed. He filed a federal habeas corpus petition, alleging that his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated. The District Court agreed, and the Eighth Circuit affirmed. This decision was based in part on Witherspoon v. Illinois, which held that ” sentence of death cannot be carried out if the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction.”

Issue. Whether “the Constitution prohibit[s] the removal for cause, prior to the guilt phase of a bifurcated capital trial, of prospective jurors whose opposition to the death penalty is so strong that is would prevent or substantially impair the performance of their duties as jurors at the sentencing phase of the trial.”

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following