Register | Lost your password?


Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 1 Q.B. 256 (Court of Appeal 1893).

Brief Fact Summary. The Plaintiff, believing Defendant’s advertisement that its product would prevent influenza, bought a Carbolic Smoke Ball and used it as directed from November 20, 1891 until January 17, 1892, when she caught the flu. Plaintiff brought suit to recover the 100

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • Next »

Additional Resources

Find the latest legal news for this practice area at Bloomberg Law

Comments are closed.