Register | Lost your password?


Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 1 Q.B. 256 (Court of Appeal 1893).

Brief Fact Summary. The Plaintiff, believing Defendant’s advertisement that its product would prevent influenza, bought a Carbolic Smoke Ball and used it as directed from November 20, 1891 until January 17, 1892, when she caught the flu. Plaintiff brought suit to recover the 100

Additional Resources

Find the latest legal news for this practice area at Bloomberg Law

  • « Previous
  • 1
  • Next »
Content Type: Brief

Comments are closed.