Held. No. Judgment of the District Court affirmed. Under the CDA, neither parents’ consent nor their participation would avoid application of the statute. The CDA fails to provide any definition of “indecent” and omits any requirement that the “patently offensive material” lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. Further, the CDA’s broad categorical prohibitions are not limited to particular times and are not dependent on any evaluation by an agency familiar with the unique characteristics of the Internet. CDA applies to the entire universe of the cyberspace. Thus, the CDA is a content-based blanket restriction on speech, as such, cannot be properly analyzed as a form of time, place and manner restriction. The CDA lacks the precision that the First Amendment of the Constitution requires when a statute regulates the content of speech. In order to deny minors access to potentially harmful speech, the statute suppresses a large amount of speech that adults have a
constitutional right to receive. The CDA places an unacceptable burden on protected speech, thus, the statute is invalid as unconstitutional.
Concurrence. The constitutionality of the CDA as a zoning law hinges on the extent to which it substantially interferes with the First Amendment rights of adults. Because the rights of adults are infringed only by the “display” provision and by the “indecency transmission” provision, the judge would invalidate the CDA only to that extent.
Discussion. This case brings the First Amendment of the Constitution into the Internet age while prohibiting speech regulations that are overbroad despite their seemingly benevolent goals.
Books and Treatises: Constitutional Law Subjects
Supreme Court Practice
Supreme Court Practice provides comprehensive guidance on all aspects of prosecuting or defending cases before the Supreme Court.
The Sovereign Immunity Defense
A comprehensive treatise explaining when civil action can be brought against states
Advertising & Commercial Speech: A First Amendment Guide
Provides a basic overview of first amendment protections in the United States
Rights for Visual Artists
Provides a basic overview of first amendment protections for visual artists
Federal Rules for the Supreme Court
Rules governing the procedures for cases heard before the United States Supreme Court.
Law ReportsLegal periodicals on Constitutional Law subjects
|United States Law Week||Privacy Law Watch|
|United States Constitution|
Search Court Opinions
|Constitutional Law||Civil Rights||Habeas Corpus|
Constitutional Law News Topics
|Constitutional Law||Supreme Court||Privacy|