Register | Lost your password?

CaseBriefs

Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuch & Co

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 73 F.R.D. 73, 1976 U.S. Dist. 22 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1008

Brief Fact Summary. Kozlowski (Plaintiff) commenced a personal injury action for injuries suffered by a minor when a pair of pajamas manufactured and marketed by the Sears, Roebuch & Co., (Defendant) ignited in flames. Defendant filed a Motion to Set Aside the Default Judgment entered against him by the court.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. Failure to produce requested documents will not be excused if the failure to do so was the result of the producing party’s difficulty in locating the records.



Facts. Plaintiff commenced this product liability claim against Defendant asserting claims based on negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability in tort. On July 17, 1975, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Produce Documents seeking a record of all complaints and communications concerning injuries or fatalities allegedly caused by the burning of children’s nightgowns, which were manufactured and marketed by Defendant. The Defendants filed a Motion to Quash on August 8, 1975. Plaintiff subsequently opposed Defendant’s Motion to Quash and filed a Motion to Compel Discovery. On January 22, 1976, the United States Magistrate field a “Memorandum and Order” overruling Defendant’s objections and ordering production within thirty days. Since Defendant did not produce the records, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Entry of Judgment by Default against the Defendant. The court found that Defendant’s failure to comply with discovery was willful and deliberate, so it entered Judgment by Default against the Defendant on the issue of liability. Defendant filed the current Motion to Set Aside the Judgment by Default.

Issue. Whether the Defendant should be compelled to produce the requested documents?

Content Type: Brief


Comments are closed.