- The Bargain Relationship

• Lucy v. Zehmer 196 Va. 493,84 S.E.2d 516,1954 Va.

• Cohen v. Cowles Media Company 4501 U.S. 663,111 S. Ct. 2513,115 L. Ed. 2d 586,1991 U.S.

• Lonegran v. Scolnick 129 Cal. App. 2d 179, 276 P.2d 8, 1954 Cal. App.

• Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store 251 Minn. 188,86 N.W.2d 689,1957 Minn.

• Leonard v. Pepsico 210 F.3d 88,2000 U.S. App.41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 779

• Bretz v. Portland General Electric Co 882 F.2d 411,1989 U.S. App.9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 213

• Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. First National Bank 101 F.3d 689; 1996 U.S. App.

• LaSalle National Bank v.Vega 167 Ill. App. 3d 154, 520 N.E.2d 1129, 1988 Ill. App. 117 Ill. Dec. 778

• Hendricks v. Behee 786 S.W.2d 610,1990 Mo. App.

• Corinthian Pharmaceutical Systems, Inc. v. Lederle Laboratories 724 F. Supp. 605,1989 U.S. Dist.11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 463

• Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1 Q.B. 256 (Court of Appeal 1893).

• Glover v. Jewish War Veterans of United States 68 A.2d 233,1949 D.C. App.

• Industrial America, Inc. v. Fulton Industries, Inc 285 A.2d 412,1971 Del.

• Adams v. Lindsell 106 Eng.Rep. 250 (Court of King's Bench, 1818).

• Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Columbus Rolling-Mill Co 119 U.S. 149, 7 S. Ct. 168, 30 L. Ed. 376, 1886 U.S.

• Textile Unlimited, Inc. v. A.BMH and Company, Inc 240 F.3d 781,2001 U.S. App.2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1332; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1673

• Hill v. Gateway 2000 522 U.S. 808; 118 S. Ct. 47;139 L. Ed. 2d 13; 1997 U.S.

• Klocek v. Gateway 2001 U.S. Dist.

• Specht v. Netscape Communications Corporation 306 F.3d 17,2002 U.S. App.48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 761

• Dickenson v. Dodds 2 Ch.D. 463 (Court of Appeal, Chancery Division, 1876).

• Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Westside Investment Corp 428 S.W.2d 92,1968 Tex.11 Tex. Sup. J. 399

• Marchiondo v. Scheck 78 N.M. 440,432 P.2d 405,1967 N.M.

• James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc 64 F.2d 344,1933 U.S. App.

• Drennan v. Star Paving Co 51 Cal. 2d 409,333 P.2d 757,1958 Cal.

• SKB Industries, Inc. v. Insite 250 Ga. App. 574,551 S.E.2d 380,2001 Ga. App.2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2099

• Konic International Corporation v. Spokane Computer Services, Inc 109 Idaho 527,708 P.2d 932,1985 Ida. App.

• Varney v. Ditmars 217 N.Y. 223,111 N.E. 822,1916 N.Y.

• Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Scheider 40 N.Y.2d 1069,360 N.E.2d 930,392 N.Y.S.2d 252,1976 N.Y.

• Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. Schumacher 52 N.Y.2d 105,417 N.E.2d 541,436 N.Y.S.2d 247,1981 N.Y.

• Oglebay Norton Company v. Armco, Inc 52 Ohio St. 3d 232,556 N.E.2d 515,1990 Ohio

• Empro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Ball-Co Manufacturing, Inc 870 F.2d 423,1989 U.S. App.

• Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc 26 Wis. 2d 683,133 N.W.2d 267,1965 Wisc.

• Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co 127 Mo. App. 383, 105 S.W. 777, 1907 Mo. App.

• Southworth v. Oliver 878 F.2d 1445; 1989 U.S. App.

• Ever-Tite Roofing Corp. v. Green 83 So. 2d 449,1955 La. App.

• Russell v. Texas Co 238 F.2d 636,1956 U.S. App.8 Oil & Gas Rep. 221

• Ammons v. Wilson & Co 170 So. 277,1936 La. App.

• Leonard Pevar Co. v. Evans Products Co 524 F. Supp. 546,1981 U.S. Dist.32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 720

• Raffles v. Whichelhaus 159 Eng.Rep. 375 (Court of Exchequer, 1864).

• Copeland v. Baskin Robbins, U.S.A 96 Cal. App. 4th 1251,117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 875,2002 Cal. App.2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2533