Mitchill v. Lath
Brief

Citation247 N.Y. 377 (1928) Brief Fact Summary. The Mitchills (Plaintiffs) brought an action against the Laths (Defendants) to enforce an oral agreement to remove an icehouse from property purchased from the Defendants.  Defendants appealed from judgment granted in favor of Plaintiffs. Synopsis of Rule of Law. An oral agreement is not collateral to the written agreement if its subject is closely related to the subject of the written agreement.  ...