Table of Cases
StudyBuddy

Table of Cases Alaska Packers Assn. v. Domenico, 117 F. 99 (9th Cir. 1902), 54 C.C.A. 485 Alden v. Presley, 637 S.W.2d 862 (Tenn. 1982) Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank, 159 N.E. 173 (N.Y. 1927), 246 N.Y. 369 Aluminum Company of America v. Essex Group, Inc., 499 F. Supp. 53 (W.D. Pa. 1980), 29 UCC Rep.Serv. 1 America’s Directories, Inc. v. Stellhorn One Hour Photo, Inc., 833 N.E.2d 1059 (Ind. App. 2005) American Standard, Inc. v. Schectman, 427 N.E.2d 512 (N.Y. 1981), 443 N.Y.S.2d 1027, 54 N.Y.2d 604 Anderson v. Douglas Lomason Co., 540 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa 1995), 131 ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES Adams v. Lindsell Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Domenico Algernon Blair, Inc., U.S. v. Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of Jamestown Angel v. Murray Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. Balfour v. Balfour Batsakis v. Demotsis Boston Ice Co. v. Potter Bovard v. Amer. Horse Enterprises, Inc. Brackenbury v. Hodgkin Britton v. Turner Broadnax v. Ledbetter Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc. C. Itoh (America), Inc. v. Jordan Int'l Co. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ...

Table of Cases
StudyBuddy

Table of Cases Abbott Laboratories v. Granite State Ins. Co., 573 F. Supp. 193 (N.D. Ill. 1983) Adams Dairy Co. v. National Dairy Products Corp. 293 F. Supp. 1164 (W.D. Mo. 1968) Aldinger v. Howard, 427 U.S. 1 (1976) Alldread v. City of Grenada, 988 F.2d 1425 (5th Cir. 1993) Alliance to End Repression v. Rochford, 75 F.R.D. 438 (N.D. Ill. 1976) Allstate Ins. Co. v. Menards, Inc., 285 F.3d 630 (7th Cir. 2002) Alltel Communications, Inc. v. City of Macon, 345 F.3d 1219 (11th Cir. 2003) American Well Works v. Layne, 241 U.S. 257 (1916) Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986 ...

Federal Questions and Federal Cases
StudyBuddy

CHAPTER 4 Federal Questions and Federal Cases Jurisdiction over Cases “Arising under” Federal Law INTRODUCTION Our first three chapters dealt with personal jurisdiction---the power of a court to require a defendant from outside the state to defend a lawsuit in that state. Now we turn to subject matter jurisdiction, a separate, additional requirement for a court to hear a case. Suppose, for example, that Engle wishes to sue her employer, Consolidated Packing Corporation, after she is fired from her job for reporting acts of fraud committed by Consolidated officers to federal autho ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES Principal discussion of a case is indicated by page numbers in italics. Adam v. Saenger Aetna Casualty & Surety v. Yeatts Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Div. Allen v. McCurry Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Soc Amchem Products, Inc., v. Windsor American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn Ankenbrandt v. Richards Asahi Metal Indus. v. Superior Court Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court Ashcroft v. Iqbal AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Atlantic Marine Constr. Co., Inc. v. United States District Court for the Western D ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES This table includes references to cases cited everywhere in this book, including in the various Exam Q&A sections. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court Ashcroft v. Iqbal AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Atlantic Marine Constr. Co., Inc. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Azada v. Carson Baldwin v. Iowa State Travelling Men’s Association Beacon Theatres v. Westover BMW of North America v. Gore Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz Burnham v. Sup ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES This table includes references to cases cited every where in this book, including in the various Exam Q&A sections. Atkins v. Virginia Blaue, Regina v. Calder v. Bull Chicago, City of v. Morales Clark v. Arizona Davis, People v. Enmund v. Florida Ewing v. California Faulkner, Regina v. Feola, U.S. v. Flores-Figueroa v. U.S. Ford v. Wainwright Foucha v. Louisiana Gementera, U.S. v. Goetz, People v. Graham v. Florida Grayned v. City of Rockford Gregg v. Georgia Hall v. Florida Hilton Hotels Corp., U.S. v. Holloway v. U.S. Iannelli v. U.S. Jones v. U.S. ...

Table of Cases
StudyBuddy

Table of Cases A; R. v. Aaron; People v. Abbott v. Queen Abdallah; State v. Acosta; People v. Addington v. Texas Adjutant; Commonwealth v. Aiken; People v. Allen v. Ulster County Court Almeida; Commonwealth v. Alsondo; United States v. Alston-Graves; United States v. Alvarez; United States v. Anderson; People v.,447 P.2d 942 (Cal. 1968) Anderson; State v.,79 S.W.3d 420 (Mo. 2002) Anderson; State v.,227 Conn. 518, 631 A.2d 1149 (1993) Apollo Energies; United States v. Apprendi v. New Jersey Arizona v. Clark Arteaga; People v. Arthur Andersen, LLP v. United States Arzon; Pe ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES Abbott, State v. Alston, State v. Anderson, People v. Antick, People v. Ashley, People v. Atencio, Commonwealth v. Atkins v. Virginia Balint, U.S. v. Beardsley, People v. Bell, U.S. v. Berry v. Superior Court Berry, People v. Blaue, Regina v. Blumenthal, U.S. v. Brown v. U.S. Brown, People v. Bryan, U.S. v. Burns v. State Burton, People v. Bush v. Commonwealth Bush, Commonwealth v. Calder v. Bull Cali, Commonwealth v. Ceballos, People v. Chicago, City of v. Morales Clark v. Arizona Clark, State v. Cobbler, People v. Commonwealth v. (listed under op ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES Principal discussion of a case is indicated by page numbers in italics. Abate v. Mundt Abington School District v. Schempp Abood v. Detroit Board of Education Abrams v. U.S. ACLU v. Reno Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena Adkins v. Children’s Hospital  Agency for Int’l Dev. v. Alliance for Open Soc’y Int’l, Inc.  Agins v. Tiburon  Agostini v. Felton  Akron v. Akron Center For Reproductive Health  Alaska Hire case  Alden v. Maine  Allegheny County v. American Civil Liberties Union Allen v. Wright  Allgeyer v. Louisiana  Allied Structural Stee ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed., 159 Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 102, 220, 306 Agency for Int’l Dev. v. Alliance for Open Soc’y Int’l, Inc., 162–163, 245, 322 Agostini v. Felton, 171 Alaska Hire case, 75 Alden v. Maine, 185 Alvarez, U.S. v., 151, 240 Ambach v. Norwick, 110, 308 Anderson v. Martin, 99 Ashcroft v. ACLU, 241, 318 Assoc. Press v. Walker, 149   Baker v. Carr, 187 Baldwin v. Montana Fish & Game Comm’n., 345 Ball v. James, 115, 309 Ballard, U.S. v., 175 Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 319 Bartnicki v. Vopper, 165 ...

Table of Cases
StudyBuddy

Table of Cases Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner,387 U.S. 136 (1967) Adamson v. California,332 U.S. 46 (1947) Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth,300 U.S. 227 (1937) Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers Union,498 U.S. 517 (1991) Alabama v. Pugh,438 U.S. 781 (1978) Alden v. Maine,527 U.S. 706 (1999) Allen v. McCurry,449 U.S. 90 (1980) Allen v. Wright,468 U.S. 737 (1984) Altria Group, Inc. v. Good,555 U.S. 70 (2008) Alvarez v. Smith,130 S. Ct. 576 (2009) Amerada Hess Corporation v. Director, Division of Taxation,490 U.S. 66 (1989) American Insurance Association v. Gar ...

Table of Cases
StudyBuddy

Table of Cases Abington School Dist. v. Schemp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) Abood v. Detroit Board of Educ., 431 U.S. 209 (1977) Abrams v. Johnson, 521 U.S. 74 (1997) Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947) Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) Adickes v. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970) Adkins v. Children's Hosp., 261 U.S. 525 (1923) Agins v. City of Tiburon, 477 U.S. 255 (1980) Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997) Aguilar v. Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (1985) Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Webster County, 488 U.S. 336 (19 ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES Agins v. City of Tiburon Alexander v. McKnight Arlington Heights, Village of, v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp Armory v. Delamirie Armstrong v. Francis Corp. Baldwin v. Boston Belle Terre, Village of, v. Boraas Berg v. Wiley Blackett v. Olanoff Bleckley v. Langston Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co., Inc. Brown v. Lober Brown v. Voss Burns v. McCormick Causby, U.S. v. Cleburne, City of, v. Cleburne Living Center Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co. Commonwealth v. Fremont Investment & ...

Table Of Cases
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES Alexander v. Medical Assoc. Clinic Anjou v. Boston Elevated Railway Co. Ash v. Cohn Ault v. International Harvester Co. Avila v. Citrus Community College District Baker v. Bolton Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. Barr v. Matteo Baxter v. Ford Motor Co. Becker v. IRM Corp. Bennett v. Stanley Berkovitz v. U.S. Bierczynski v. Rogers Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. Bird v. Jones Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of FBI Blakeley v. Shortal’s Estate Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co. Bonkowski v. Arlan’s Department Store Boomer v. Atlantic Cement ...

TABLE OF CASES
StudyBuddy

TABLE OF CASES This table includes references to cases cited everywhere in this book, including in the various Exam Q&A sections. 532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center, Inc. Avila v. Citrus Community College District Baxter v. Ford Motor Co. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of FBI Blakeley v. Shortal’s Est. Byrne v. Boadle Carafano v. Metrosplash.com, Inc. Cilley, Estate of v. Lane Davidson v. Cannon Dole v. Dow Chemical Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders Enright v. Eli Lilly Foster v. Preston Mill Co. Garratt v. Dailey Gertz v. Robert Welc ...

North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands)
Brief

View this case and other resources at: Citation. I.C.J. 1969 I.C.J. 3 Brief Fact Summary. The view that customary rules of international law determined the boundaries of areas located on the continental shelf between their countries and the Federal Republic of Germany (D) was contended by Denmark (P) and the Netherlands (P). Synopsis of Rule of Law. For a custom to become binding as international law, it must amount to a settled practice and must be rendered obligatory by a rule requiring it. ...

Constitutional Issues Arising In Criminal Cases
Outline

A. Confrontation Clause Generally: The Sixth Amendment Confrontation guarantees a criminal defendant the right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him." The Confrontation Clause applies in state and federal prosecutions and operates independently of any hearsay rules. Evidence otherwise admissible under the hearsay rules must nevertheless be excluded if it will violate the defendant’s right to confront and cross-examine the declarant. B. The Confrontation Clause and hearsay under the rule of Ohio v. Roberts: Ohio v. Roberts made hearsay evidence admissible in a criminal cas ...

Rules Concerning Impeachment In Cases Of Sexual Assault Or Child Molestation
Outline

Many jurisdictions have enacted rape shield laws which protect the victim of a rape from impeachment by evidence of prior sexual misconduct FRE 412(a) forbids the use of opinion or reputation testimony regarding the past sexual behavior of the alleged victim, and only permits other evidence regarding the alleged victim's past sexual behavior in three specific situations, and under strict procedural guidelines. ...

Civil Rights Cases
Brief

View this case and other resources at: Citation. ...

Slaughter-House Cases
Brief

View this case and other resources at: Citation. 83 U.S. 36, 16 Wall. 36, 21 L. Ed. 394 (1873) Brief Fact Summary. A Louisiana statute granting a monopoly over the butchering trade in three areas of the state was unsuccessfully challenged by Plaintiffs, butchers not included in the monopoly, under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. Synopsis of Rule of Law. The Thirteenth Amendment does not empower individuals when their rights are taken, but rather is limited only to slavery. The purpose of the Fifteenth Amendment is to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment. The Privileg ...

The Slaughter-House Cases
Brief

View this case and other resources at: Citation. 83 U.S. 36, 21 L. Ed. 394, 872 U.S. 1139,16 Wall. 36. Brief Fact Summary. A Louisiana statute gave the Slaughter-House Company exclusive rights to the New Orleans slaughterhouse business. Plaintiffs, a group of butchers (Plaintiffs) sued. Synopsis of Rule of Law. In interpreting a provision of the United States Constitution (Constitution), it is necessary to look to the purpose for which the provision was enacted. ...

New York Times Co. v. United States [the Cases of the Pentagon Papers.]
Brief

View this case and other resources at: Citation. ...

Civil Rights Cases
Brief

View this case and other resources at: Citation. 109 U.S. 3, 3 S. Ct. 18, 27 L. Ed. 835 (1883) Brief Fact Summary. Several individuals of color were denied admission to theaters, cabs, cars, and inns based on their race. These individuals claimed that this violates their under a federal law passed in 1875 that entitles all individuals in the United States the right to equal treatment in places of public accommodation and the quasi-public facilities of this country. These individuals won their lawsuits under this act, and the Defendants appeal claiming that this act is an uncon ...

Slaughter-House Cases
Brief

View this case and other resources at: Citation. 83 U.S. 36, 16 Wall. 36, 21 L. Ed. 394 (1873) Brief Fact Summary. Butchers had to use one facility to slaughter their livestock. All competing plants were closed and the butchers had to right to slaughter at the corporation's plant. Synopsis of Rule of Law. The Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments do not protect people from state legislation. ...